DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking vs Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Detailed comparison for LLMs
DeepSeekGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking and Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
31.280
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
63.850
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
28.710
Zero-Shot (ASR)
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
1.290
Key Highlights
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
deepseek-v3-2-thinking
gemini-2-0-flash-lite