Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicNVIDIA
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet and NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
20.280
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
31.430
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
25.270
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
0
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-7-sonnet
llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1