Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
20.280
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
31.430
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
25.270
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
0
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-7-sonnet
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert