Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Meta Llama 4 Scout
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaMeta
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Meta Llama 4 Scout across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Llama 4 Scout
29.970
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Llama 4 Scout
63.460
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Llama 4 Scout
20.330
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Llama 4 Scout
6.140
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen3-vl-32b-thinking
llama-4-scout