Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaMistral
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Mistral Mixtral 8x7B across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Mixtral 8x7B
38.030
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Mixtral 8x7B
66.160
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Mixtral 8x7B
24.310
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Mixtral 8x7B
23.620
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen3-vl-32b-thinking
mixtral-8x7b