Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
100.000
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
31.280
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
100.000
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
63.850
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
100.000
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
28.710
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
100.000
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
1.290
Key Highlights
- Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen3-vl-32b-thinking
gemini-2-0-flash-lite