Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Google Gemini 2.0 Flash
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Google Gemini 2.0 Flash across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash
33.600
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash
67.640
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash
30.390
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2.770
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen3-vl-32b-thinking
gemini-2-0-flash