Mistral Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 vs Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is the more secure of the two: Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 scores 44.0% and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Mistral Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 vs Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 has a lower Overall (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 or Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Moonshot AI Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 is the more secure of the two: Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 scores 44.0% and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 vs Kimi K2-Thinking-0905?
Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 has a 44.0% ASR and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 has a 38.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Ministral 3 14B Instruct 2512 and Kimi K2-Thinking-0905 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.