MiniMax MiniMax M1 40K vs Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the more secure of the two: MiniMax M1 40K scores 43.5% and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 scores 33.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for MiniMax MiniMax M1 40K vs Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 has a lower Overall (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax MiniMax M1 40K or Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the more secure of the two: MiniMax M1 40K scores 43.5% and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 scores 33.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of MiniMax M1 40K vs Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512?
MiniMax M1 40K has a 43.5% ASR and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 has a 33.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were MiniMax M1 40K and Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.