Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
GoogleMistral
Head-to-Head Overview
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT and Mistral Mixtral 8x7B across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Mixtral 8x7B
38.030
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Mixtral 8x7B
66.160
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Mixtral 8x7B
24.310
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Mixtral 8x7B
23.620
Key Highlights
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert
mixtral-8x7b