Deepseek Deepseek R1 vs Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
Detailed comparison for LLMs
DeepseekGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Deepseek Deepseek R1 and Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Deepseek R1
42.580
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Deepseek R1
76.890
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Deepseek R1
34.790
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Deepseek R1
16.080
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Key Highlights
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
deepseek-r1
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert