Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicNVIDIA
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 4.0 Sonnet is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet and NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
13.630
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
22.020
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
14.790
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
4.080
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-4-0-sonnet
llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1