Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicNVIDIA
Head-to-Head Overview
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.390
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.830
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.810
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.540
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Key Highlights
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v2
llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1