Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs MiniMax MiniMax M2
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicMiniMax
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and MiniMax MiniMax M2 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.390
MiniMax M2
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.830
MiniMax M2
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.810
MiniMax M2
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.540
MiniMax M2
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v2
minimax-m2