Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.390
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.830
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.810
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.540
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v2
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert