Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicDeepSeek
Head-to-Head Overview
DeepSeek VL2 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.390
DeepSeek VL2
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.830
DeepSeek VL2
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.810
DeepSeek VL2
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.540
DeepSeek VL2
0
Key Highlights
- DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v2
deepseek-vl2