Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 vs DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicDeepSeek
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.390
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.830
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.810
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.540
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v2
deepseek-v3-2-thinking