Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicNVIDIA
Head-to-Head Overview
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0
Key Highlights
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1