Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicMiniMax
Head-to-Head Overview
MiniMax M1 80K is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
MiniMax M1 80K
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
MiniMax M1 80K
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
MiniMax M1 80K
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
MiniMax M1 80K
0
Key Highlights
- MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K has a lower Overall (ASR).
- MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
minimax-m1-80k