Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
100.000
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert