Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicDeepSeek
Head-to-Head Overview
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking
0
Key Highlights
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3.2 Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
deepseek-v3-2-thinking