Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs Deepseek Deepseek V3
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicDeepseek
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and Deepseek Deepseek V3 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
Deepseek V3
47.210
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
Deepseek V3
79.540
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
Deepseek V3
49.270
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
Deepseek V3
12.810
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
deepseek-v3