Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 vs Deepseek Deepseek R1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AnthropicDeepseek
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 and Deepseek Deepseek R1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
Deepseek R1
42.580
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
Deepseek R1
76.890
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
Deepseek R1
34.790
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
Deepseek R1
16.080
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1
deepseek-r1