Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaAnthropic
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking and Anthropic Claude 4.0 Sonnet across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
0
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
13.630
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
0
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
22.020
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
0
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
14.790
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
0
Claude 4.0 Sonnet
4.080
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen3-vl-8b-thinking
claude-4-0-sonnet