Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B and Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.030
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
73.940
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.870
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
5.270
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT
0
Key Highlights
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen-qwq-32b
gemma-3n-e2b-instructed-litert