Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaAnthropic
Head-to-Head Overview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B and Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.030
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
16.010
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
73.940
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
28.390
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.870
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
19.310
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen QwQ 32B
5.270
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1
0.350
Key Highlights
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen-qwq-32b
claude-3-5-sonnet-v1