Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B vs Google Gemma 3n E4B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaGoogle
Head-to-Head Overview
Gemma 3n E4B is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B and Google Gemma 3n E4B across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
26.350
Gemma 3n E4B
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
55.160
Gemma 3n E4B
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
23.660
Gemma 3n E4B
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
0.250
Gemma 3n E4B
0
Key Highlights
- Google Gemma 3n E4B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E4B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E4B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Google Gemma 3n E4B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen-2-5-72b
gemma-3n-e4b