Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B vs Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Detailed comparison for LLMs
AlibabaAlibaba
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is the overall winner in this comparison!
LLM Metric
Comparison of Attack Success Rate (ASR) metrics for Alibaba Qwen 2.5 72B and Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking across the three attack methods.
Overall (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
26.350
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
55.160
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
23.660
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Qwen 2.5 72B
0.250
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
0
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Metric Radar Chart
qwen-2-5-72b
qwen3-vl-32b-thinking