Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
Last reviewed: 2026-07-03
| Feature | GuardionAI | Vijil |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | AI Agent Trust Evaluation |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | SaaS / On-premises |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | ~17ms real-time detection (Dome) |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Vijil figures from public documentation, reviewed 2026-07-03.
AI agent trust platform spanning evaluation (Diamond), runtime defense (Dome), hardened components (Depot), and continuous improvement via reinforcement learning (Darwin), producing agent trust scores mapped to NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act. Raised a $17M round in November 2025 and was named a Gartner Cool Vendor in agentic AI trust and security. It is categorized under AI Red Teaming & Testing in the Guardion AI Security Index.
Vijil raised a $17M Series A (2025-11), bringing total disclosed funding to $23M.
No, Vijil is a commercial product (Enterprise subscription).
Teams evaluating Vijil most often compare it with Promptfoo, garak (NVIDIA), Patronus AI, and GuardionAI — all listed under AI Red Teaming & Testing.
Vijil focuses on ai agent trust evaluation, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.
Last reviewed: 2026-07-03
Sources: vijil.ai · siliconangle.com