Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
| Feature | GuardionAI | Tenable (Apex Security) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | AI-SPM & Exposure Mgmt |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | Cloud API |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | N/A (Scanning) |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) | SOC2 |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Tenable (Apex Security) figures from public documentation.
Now part of Tenable, Apex Security provides visibility and risk assessment for AI models, focusing on the 'AI Exposure Graph'. It is categorized under AI-SPM & Governance in the Guardion AI Security Index.
Tenable was acquired by Tenable. Now part of Tenable, Apex Security provides visibility and risk assessment for AI models, focusing on the 'AI Exposure Graph'.
No, Tenable (Apex Security) is a commercial product (Enterprise).
Teams evaluating Tenable (Apex Security) most often compare it with Protect AI (Palo Alto Networks), Wiz (AI-SPM), Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS), and GuardionAI — all listed under AI-SPM & Governance.
Tenable (Apex Security) focuses on ai-spm & exposure mgmt, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.