Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
| Feature | GuardionAI | Securiti |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | Data Privacy & Governance |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | Cloud API |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | N/A (Governance) |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) | SOC2, GDPR, CCPA |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Securiti figures from public documentation.
Centralized platform enabling safe use of data and AI with strong governance and privacy controls. It is categorized under Data Security & Privacy in the Guardion AI Security Index.
No, Securiti is a commercial product (Enterprise).
Teams evaluating Securiti most often compare it with Zscaler (GenAI Security), Private AI, Credal.ai, and GuardionAI — all listed under Data Security & Privacy.
Securiti focuses on data privacy & governance, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.