Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
| Feature | GuardionAI | Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | AI-SPM & Runtime Security |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | Cloud API |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | Optimized for Cloud |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) | SOC2, GDPR, ISO 42001 |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS) figures from public documentation.
Protect AI is now part of Prisma AIRS: Palo Alto acquired it in July 2025 and integrated its model scanning, AI-BOM, and runtime technology natively into the platform, starting with Prisma AIRS 2.0 (October 2025).
Integrated AI security platform providing visibility across the AI lifecycle, from development to production, ensuring compliant and secure model usage. It is categorized under AI-SPM & Governance in the Guardion AI Security Index.
No, Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS) is a commercial product (Tiered Enterprise).
Teams evaluating Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS) most often compare it with Protect AI (Palo Alto Networks), Wiz (AI-SPM), Apiiro, and GuardionAI — all listed under AI-SPM & Governance.
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma AIRS) focuses on ai-spm & runtime security, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.