Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
Last reviewed: 2026-07-03
| Feature | GuardionAI | Noma Security |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | Supply Chain & Agent Security |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | Cloud API |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | Variable |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) | SOC2 |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Noma Security figures from public documentation, reviewed 2026-07-03.
Noma Security holds Extended conformance (R1–R9) in the CSA AARM builder registry — the highest tier, indicating comprehensive runtime security with operational maturity features.
Focuses on the entire AI lifecycle, securing the data science supply chain, runtime pipelines, and autonomous agents. It is categorized under Agent & MCP Security in the Guardion AI Security Index.
Noma Security raised a $100M Series B (2025-10).
No, Noma Security is a commercial product (Quote).
Teams evaluating Noma Security most often compare it with Lasso Security, Akto, Snyk (Invariant Labs), and GuardionAI — all listed under Agent & MCP Security.
Noma Security focuses on supply chain & agent security, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.
Last reviewed: 2026-07-03
Sources: noma.security