Which AI security platform is right for your team? We break down the differences in features, latency, and protection scope to help you decide.
| Feature | GuardionAI | Keycard |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Agent Runtime Governance | Agentic IAM |
| Tool Call Protection | Deep Inspection | Not documented |
| Deployment | Inline Security Gateway / Guard API / Claude Code plugin | Cloud API |
| Guardrails Latency | <130ms policy decision | Low |
| Detection Accuracy | 96.3 F1 on the Prompt Security Leaderboard with 0.02% false positives | Not published / varies by deployment |
| Compliance | GDPR-ready, HIPAA-ready, LGPD-ready, SOC 2 Type II (in progress) |
GuardionAI figures from guardion.ai (Policy engine decisions return in under 130ms — 20× faster than cloud provider guardrails.) • Keycard figures from public documentation.
Deterministic identity and access stack for AI agents, enabling per-task permission boxes. It is categorized under Agent Identity & Access in the Guardion AI Security Index.
No, Keycard is a commercial product (Enterprise).
Teams evaluating Keycard most often compare it with Permit.io, Okta (AI Agent Identity), Formal, and GuardionAI — all listed under Agent Identity & Access.
Keycard focuses on agentic iam, while GuardionAI is an agent runtime governance platform ("EDR for AI agents") that governs every agent tool call inline with sub-130ms guardrails latency.
Sources: aarm.dev